l l c r

+ 6 (03) 2776 8000

+ 6 (03) 2776 8000

Latest Update

Tactical strategy : receivership versus liquidation

Sep 8 2026

🦞 It’s never truly over until it’s over.
When a company goes into receivership and liquidation, stakeholders usually brace for a total loss. But a recent case proved that persistence in insolvency strategy can completely rewrite the script. -Was it a change in commercial circumstances or tactical brilliance? A bit of both.

The Background & Challenge
In 2019, liquidators were appointed by unsecured creditors to appraise a sale by the Receiver & Manager (R&M). What followed was a brutal, multi-year legal uphill battle.

❌ Setback 1 (2019–2022): The first lawsuit regarding administrative powers to manage was lost at the High Court and Court of Appeal. Due to Covid-19 and funding constraints, leave to appeal to the Federal Court was disallowed for being out of time.

❌ Setback 2 (2021–2025): A second lawsuit alleging fraud was dismissed on res judicata grounds, a decision upheld through to the Federal Court in 2025.

At this point, it looked like all efforts by the Liquidators were for naught, and unsecured creditors’ hopes were crushed.

The Plot Twist 💥
Despite the legal defeats, the tide turned on the commercial front. The R&M’s original Buyer failed to complete the sale—even after extensions spanning more than 5 years.

In February 2026, the Chargee terminated the sale. In April 2026, they threw down a gauntlet: a strict “7+30-day” window for the Liquidators to redeem the charge.

The Ultimate Turnaround ⚖️
Against all odds, the Liquidators secured the necessary funding and redeemed the charge a week ahead of schedule in May 2026.

By June, the Chargee returned the original title alongside the signed discharge and satisfaction of charge. This month (July 2026), the

Liquidators officially took over the project site from the R&M.

The Key Takeaways:
1️⃣ Lost the battle, won the war: Legal litigation is sometimes just a tool to buy time and prolong hope, but the ultimate victory often happens on the commercial battlefield.

2️⃣ Persistency pays: Keeping stakeholders aligned through years of setbacks is half the battle in crisis management.

3️⃣ Commercial reality rules: Strategy opens the door, but capital sustainability closes the deal.

Kudos to the liquidation team for navigating this complex maze and protecting unsecured creditor value when all odds were against them.

High Court Dismisses Creditor’s Appeal on Proof of Debt

Jan 27 2026

The High Court dismissed wirh cost, an appeal filed by a creditor against the liquidator's rejection of the proof of debt, as the creditor could not produce evidence to the contrary after the liquidator had shown evidence of payment by the company prior to its liquidation which was in excess of the creditor's claim.

High Court Upholds Liquidator’s Interrogatories

Jan 19 2026

The High Court had dismissed an application by ex-directors cum shareholders to set aside Interrogatories order obtained by the liquidator. The Judge was of the view that the liquidator is entitled to ask questions listed in the interrogatories to the ex-directors cum shareholders

High Court Grants Liquidator Power to Question Officers Under s502 CA 2016

JUN 03 2025

On 3 June 2025 , the High Court of Malaya in KL had granted the liquidator to interrogates current and past officers of the company via affidavits under s502 CA 2016

Examination of Officers of Company

oct 04 2024

s503 CA 2016 - liquidators managed to get court order to examine 12 past and current officers of company in liquidation over a period of nearly 3 years since 2021.

Purchasers Group's claims dismissed

OCT 8 2023

In late 2019, 6 purchasers filed an application for leave from court to sue a developer that went into liquidation. After leave was granted by the Court to the 6 purchasers in 2020, a suit was filed by 59 purchasers instead of 6, against the developer, the landowners, the land offices and authorities for damages based on alleged fraud. The liquidator and the land proprietors applied to strike out the suit. The Court in 2022 allowed the striking out application by the liquidator and the land proprietors. The purchasers appealed. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal in early 2023. The Federal Court, in the 3rd quarter of 2023, disallowed the leave application by the purchasers.

JMB's carparks claim dismissed

SEP 28 2023

In a stratafied development in KL, JMB challenged the liquidators' decision to sell car parking bays belonging to a company in liquidation in 2017 alleging that the car parking bays were part of the common properties. High Court in April 2019 decided in favour of JMB. In Jan 2022, the Court of Appeal overturned the High Court's decision. JMB then applied for leave to appeal but the Federal Court dismissed the leave application by JMB in Nov 2022.

Rejection of POD

Sep 12 2023

A listed company filed a claim against company liquidation for monies paid/advance to a subsidiary company where subsidiary company claimed to have paid on behalf of a company liquidation. Liquidators rejected the listed company's claim on 11.11.2022. Listed company then filed an appeal against the rejection by the liquidators on 01.12.2022. After filing all legal submission, the listed company withdrawn its appeal with a cost of RM10,000.00

Scroll to Top